On the (lack of) representativeness of quasi-static variational fracture models for unstable crack propagation.

• Unstable crack propagations violate the fundamental quasi-static hypothesis. • Unrightfully neglecting inertial effects can lead to unsafe failure predictions. • Ignoring the diffusion of mechanical information yields unphysical crack patterns. • Not following the unstable crack growth weakens the irreversibility condition. • All insights above hold for the most common variational approaches to fracture. The present work is devoted to prove that unstable crack propagation events do not comply with quasi-static hypotheses and thus should be modelled by dynamic approaches. Comprehensive supporting evidence is provided on the basis of three different analyses conducted on multi-ligament unstable fracture conditions, including a simplified Spring-Mass model, detailed quasi-static and dynamic Phase Field fracture models, and bespoke experiments with 3D printed specimens. The obtained results unequivocally show that neglecting the inertial effects can lead to unsafe predictions in the presence of energetic barriers for the development of fracture. Likewise, quasi-static Phase Field fracture models are proven to yield crack patterns that disagree with the experimental evidence because they overlook the progressive diffusion of the mechanical information within the continuum. Moreover, the inability of quasi-static approaches to follow unstable crack propagation is shown to weaken the crucial irreversibility condition of fracture. Overall, these experimentally backed insights should be gravely reckoned with, for they are not exclusive to Phase Field fracture models but common to (almost) any variational approach to fracture, inter alia Cohesive Zone Models or Continuum Damage Mechanics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]