Back to Search Start Over

Fashioning esophagogastric anastomosis in robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: a multicenter experience.

Authors :
Milone, Marco
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
Cianchi, Fabio
Coratti, Andrea
D'Amore, Anna
De Manzoni, Giovanni
De Pasqual, Carlo Alberto
Formisano, Giampaolo
Jovine, Elio
Morelli, Luca
Offi, Mariafortuna
Peri, Andrea
Pietrabissa, Andrea
Staderini, Fabio
Tribuzi, Angela
Giacopuzzi, Simone
Source :
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 3/22/2024, Vol. 409 Issue 1, p1-9. 9p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study is to compare outcomes of the robotic hand-sewn, linear- and circular-stapled techniques performed to create an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis in patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Methods: Patients who underwent a planned Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy were retrospectively analysed from prospectively maintained databases. Only patients who underwent a robotic thoracic approach with the creation of an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups: hand-sewn-, circular stapled-, and linear-stapled anastomosis group. Demographic information and surgery-related data were extracted. The primary outcome was the rate of anastomotic leakages (AL) in the three groups. Moreover, the rate of grade A, B and C anastomotic leakage were evaluated. In addition, patients of each group were divided in subgroups according to the characteristics of anastomotic fashioning technique. Results: Two hundred and thirty patients were enrolled in the study. No significant differences were found between the three groups about AL rate (p = 0.137). Considering the management of the AL for each of the three groups, no significant differences were found. Evaluating the correlation between AL rate and the characteristics of anastomotic fashioning technique, no significant differences were found. Conclusions: No standardized anastomotic fashioning technique has yet been generally accepted. This study could be considered a call to perform ad hoc high-quality studies involving high-volume centers for upper gastrointestinal surgery to evaluate what is the most advantageous anastomotic technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14352443
Volume :
409
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176224856
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03290-3