Back to Search Start Over

Time to consider blunt needles for implant surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis shows that blunt suture needles reduce glove perforation.

Authors :
O'Donnell, Oisín
Gallagher, Clodagh
Chaudhary, Ali Muhammad
Iqbal, Asif
Source :
Surgeon (Elsevier Science). Apr2024, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p107-115. 9p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Despite a recent Cochrane Review demonstrating blunt suture needles are safer for surgeons, the use of blunt suture needles has not become widely adopted. In the 'Implant Era', with the value of medical implant companies to surpass $145 billion by 2027, should we re-examine the use of blunt suture needles, especially to reduce infection in implant surgery? We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing whether blunt suture needles reduce risks to surgeons and patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases were searched for RCTs. Dichotomous variables were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the MH method. Random or fixed effects modelling use was based on statistical heterogeneity (I2). 14 RCTs were identified with 2488 patients. The RCTs included laparotomies, caesarean sections, episiotomies, and orthopaedic surgeries. Blunt suture needles when compared with sharp needles resulted in a significant reduction in glove perforation; RR: 0.47, 95% CI [0.37 to 0.60] and needlestick injuries, RR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.26 to 0.97]. Sharp needles caused more wound infections, but the result was not statistically significant; RR: 2.73, 95% CI [0.54 to 13.76], p 0.22. Surgeon's satisfaction decreased with blunt needles compared with sharp (RR: 1.22, 95% CI [1.09 to 1.37]). Blunt suture needles are safer than sharp needles for surgeons and likely reduce risks to patients. This, however, comes at the cost of decreased ease of use. The authors recommend the routine use of blunt suture needles, especially in implant surgery. Blunt needles reduce glove perforation by 73% (95% CI: 53–85%). Blunt needles also reduce needlestick injury by 52%. Blunt needles are safer for surgeons and reduce the risk of infectious disease. The ease of handling of blunt needles, however, is worse than sharp needles. The authors recommend blunt needle use, especially in implant surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1479666X
Volume :
22
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Surgeon (Elsevier Science)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176069612
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2023.10.009