Back to Search Start Over

Association of the neonatal Fc receptor promoter variable number of tandem repeat polymorphism with immunoglobulin response in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

Authors :
Fisse, Anna Lena
Schäfer, Emelie
Hieke, Alina
Schröder, Maximilian
Klimas, Rafael
Brünger, Jil
Huckemann, Sophie
Grüter, Thomas
Sgodzai, Melissa
Schneider‐Gold, Christiane
Gold, Ralf
Nguyen, Huu Phuc
Pitarokoili, Kalliopi
Motte, Jeremias
Arning, Larissa
Source :
European Journal of Neurology. Apr2024, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p1-7. 7p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background and purpose: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease with humoral and cellular autoimmunity causing demyelination of peripheral nerves, commonly treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). The neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), encoded by the FCGRT gene, prevents the degradation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) by recycling circulating IgG. A variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism in the promoter region of the FCGRT gene is associated with different expression levels of mRNA and protein. Thus, patients with genotypes associated with relatively low FcRn expression may show a poorer treatment response to IVIg due to increased IVIg degradation. Methods: VNTR genotypes were analyzed in 144 patients with CIDP. Patients' clinical data, including neurological scores and treatment data, were collected as part of the Immune‐Mediated Neuropathies Biobank registry. Results: Most patients (n = 124, 86%) were VNTR 3/3 homozygotes, and 20 patients (14%) were VNTR 2/3 heterozygotes. Both VNTR 3/3 and VNTR 2/3 genotype groups showed no difference in clinical disability and immunoglobulin dosage. However, patients with a VNTR 2 allele were more likely to receive subcutaneous immunoglobulins (SCIg) than patients homozygous for the VNTR 3 allele (25% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to receive second‐line therapy (75% vs. 54%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: The VNTR 2/3 genotype is associated with the administration of SCIg, possibly reflecting a greater benefit from SCIg due to more constant immunoglobulin levels without lower IVIg levels between the treatment circles. Also, the greater need for second‐line treatment in VNTR 2/3 patients could be an indirect sign of a lower response to immunoglobulins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13515101
Volume :
31
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
176012291
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.16205