Back to Search Start Over

Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients Undergoing Curative-Intent Surgery after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors :
Hyun Kyung Yang
Mi-Suk Park
Kyunghwa Han
Geonsik Eom
Yong Eun Chung
Jin-Young Choi
Seungmin Bang
Chang Moo Kang
Jinsil Seong
Myeong-Jin Kim
Source :
Cancer Research & Treatment. Jan2024, Vol. 56 Issue 1, p247-258. 12p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Purpose Clinical prognostic criteria using preoperative factors were not developed for post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) surgery of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to identify preoperative factors associated with overall survival (OS) in PDAC patients who underwent post-NAT curative-intent surgery and develop risk stratification criteria. Materials and Methods Consecutive PDAC patients who underwent post-NAT curative-intent surgeries between 2007 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, laboratory, surgical, and histopathologic variables were collected. Baseline, preoperative, and interval changes of computed tomography (CT) findings proposed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to select preoperative variables associated with OS. We developed risk stratification criteria composed of the significant preoperative variables, i.e., post-NAT response criteria. We compared the discrimination performance of post-NAT response criteria with that of post-NAT pathological (yp) American Joint Cancer Committee TNM staging system. Results One hundred forty-five PDAC patients were included. Stable or increased tumor size on CT (hazard ratio [HR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58 to 4.21; p < 0.001) and elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.11 to 3.55; p=0.021) were independent factors of OS. The OS of the patient groups stratified by post-NAT response criteria which combined changes in tumor size and CA19-9 showed significant difference (p < 0.001). Such stratification was comparable to ypTNM staging in discrimination performance (difference of C-index, 0.068; 95% CI, -0.012 to 0.142). Conclusion "Any degree of decrease in tumor size on CT" and CA19-9 normalization or staying normal were independent favorable factors of OS. The combination of the two factors discriminated OS comparably to ypTNM staging. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15982998
Volume :
56
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Cancer Research & Treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175745655
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2023.586