Reply to: From Unsolicited Medical Opinions to Viral Medical Discussions: Is Sharing Caring?

The article discusses the ethical considerations surrounding the participation of specialists in movement disorders in online medical discussions. The authors highlight the issue of unsolicited medical opinions (UMO) and the potential harm that can arise from sharing medical observations online without proper consent or authorization. They propose starting an ethical discussion on whether specialists should adhere to a variant of the Goldwater rule, which states that a professional opinion should not be offered without conducting an examination and obtaining proper authorization. The authors emphasize the need for ethical and legal caution when engaging in online discussions about people with neurological signs. [Extracted from the article]