Back to Search Start Over

Clinical efficacy of cefiderocol-based regimens in patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors :
Gatti, Milo
Cosentino, Federica
Giannella, Maddalena
Viale, Pierluigi
Pea, Federico
Source :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Feb2024, Vol. 63 Issue 2, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

• The use of cefiderocol for CRAB infections is a matter of debate. • A systematic review assessing cefiderocol efficacy in CRAB infections is provided. • Six studies (one RCT and five observational) comprising a total of 561 patients were included. • Lower mortality rate was found in patients with CRAB infections treated with cefiderocol regimens. • Lower mortality rate with cefiderocol was confirmed in all subgroup analyses. To perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the clinical efficacy of cefiderocol-based regimens for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections. Two authors independently searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, from inception to 02 July 2023, for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing clinical efficacy of cefiderocol-based vs. non-cefiderocol-based regimens in patients with CRAB infections. Data were extracted by the two authors independently, and the quality of included studies was independently assessed using ROB 2.0 or ROBINS-I tools. Primary outcome was mortality rate. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratios (ORs) retrieved from studies providing adjustment for confounders using a random-effects model with the inverse variance method. Multiple subgroups and sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the source of heterogeneity. A total of 530 articles were screened, and 6 studies (1 RCT and 5 observational; N=561; 247 cefiderocol-based vs. 314 non-cefiderocol-based regimens) were included. Cefiderocol did not significantly reduce in-hospital mortality compared to alternative therapies (predominantly colistin-based), but the confidence intervals around the effect estimate included clinically important benefit (N=5; OR 0.64; 95%CI 0.40–1.04; I 2=57.5%). When only observational studies providing adjustment for confounders were considered, a lower risk of mortality was found in patients treated with cefiderocol-based regimens (N=4; OR 0.53; 95%CI 0.39–0.71; I 2=0.0%). Cefiderocol-based regimens were associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality in patients with CRAB infections in observational studies providing proper adjustment for confounders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09248579
Volume :
63
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
175411551
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.107047