Shear bond strength between standard or modified zirconia surfaces and two resin cements incorporating or not 10-MDP in their matrix.

This study aimed first to compare the shear bond strength between zirconia samples luted to enamel with a 10-MDP- containing resin cement (Panavia F2.0, Kuraray, Japan) and those luted with a resin cement using a separated 10-MDP monomer-containing bottle (Panavia V5, Kuraray, Japan). The second objective was to evaluate the bond stability after 150 days of aging in water, between enamel and zirconia ceramic surface enhanced with a glass-ceramic coating. 80 specimens composed of ceramic cylinders and enamel disks were obtained, within eight experimental groups (n = 10). 60 zirconia cylinders (Katana STML zirconia, Kuraray, Japan) were assigned to 3 groups according to their surface treatment: milled/sintered surface (ZRCT), tribochemical silica-coating (Cojet™ Sand, 3 M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) (ZRTC), and glass-ceramic coating (IPS e.max Zirpress) (ZRZP). 20 cylinders of lithium disilicate had a milled surface (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) (ECAD). The cylinders of each group were further divided into two subgroups according to the resin cement used: Panavia F2.0 (-PF) and Panavia V5 (-PV). All specimens were stored in distilled water for 150 days before shear bond strength (SBS) tests. The fracture mode was analyzed, and data were statistically computed (two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, p < 0.05, SPSS, IBM, v26). The ECAD-PF group recorded the highest SBS values (31.75 ± 2.2), and the ZRCT-PF group recorded the lowest values (5.59 ± 1.1). The two-way ANOVA test showed that ceramic surface treatment had a statistically significant effect on SBS (F (3,72) = 38.95, p < 0.001) while the type of ARC did not (F (1,72) = 2.40, p = 0.126). Tukey's post hoc test revealed no statistical difference between the ZRZP and the ZRTC or ECAD groups. Within the limitations of this study, the PV resin achieved similar shear bond strength results between tribocoated zirconia and enamel compared to the one for glass-ceramic and enamel. Furthermore, a long-term durable bond, similar to the glass-ceramic one, was achieved with the heat pressed ceramic coated specimens. Thus, this new surface treatment could be recommended for anterior cantilever bridges for its fracture resistance and bonding ability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]