Competitiveness of public transit considering travel time reliability: A case study for commuter trips in Hangzhou, China.

Enhancing the temporal competitiveness of public transit (PT) over private cars is a crucial strategy for promoting PT mode share and alleviating traffic congestion, especially for commuter trips. However, to our best knowledge, previous studies have rarely considered the impact of time reliability and analyzed the critical stages (e.g., accessing, waiting, transferring) that affect PT competitiveness. To fill these research gaps, we develop a comprehensive set of indicators to evaluate the effect of temporal reliability on the competitiveness of PT compared to private cars for commuter trips. We then conduct a detailed examination of the commuting competitiveness of PT at both the Origin-Destination (OD) and Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) levels by combining data from various sources obtained from Hangzhou, China. The results show that the average competitiveness of PT increases after considering reliability. Metro competitiveness rises significantly, and bus competitiveness increases for short trips but decreases for long trips. Furthermore, the bus is far less competitive than the metro, and TAZs near the metro stations could be highly competitive. Moreover, in-bus time affects bus competitiveness primarily, and improving the accessibility of metro stations is essential to enhance metro competitiveness. In conclusion, the proposed methodology presents a comprehensive approach to assess the competitiveness of PT versus cars, including travel time reliability. This methodology enables a more nuanced understanding of the factors influencing PT competitiveness and offers valuable insights for strategically intervening to enhance its performance effectively. • Public transport is more competitive than cars when travel time reliability is considered than when it is not. • Metro is more competitive than the bus, especially considering travel time reliability. • It is not the case that the higher density of the public transit stops, the more competitive the PT is. • Long in-bus and transferring time, low accessibility of station decreases the bus and metro competitiveness, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]