The early use of bisoprolol in patients with severe sepsis and its impact on the patients outcome.

Objectives To explore the hypothesis that beta 1 adrenergic receptor blockage might be protective through attenuation of destructive sympathetic activity and catecholaminergic inflammatory effects in severe sepsis patients. Design Prospective, randomized, controlled study. Settings Critical care department in Alexandria main university hospital. Patients and methods The study was conducted on 50 adult patients who were admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine in the Alexandria Main University Hospital who fulfilled the criteria for severe sepsis according to The American College Of Chest Physicians, patients were randomly assigned into two groups, group I: Included 25 patients receiving Bisoprolol 2.5 to 10 mg enterally for a target heart rate 80–90 beat/minute within the first 24 h according to the effect on hemodynamic stabilization and group II: Included 25 patients, as a control group, who received routine management of severe sepsis. Both groups were followed up and compared regarding the primary end points (discharge from the intensive care unit after recovery, septic shock or death) and the secondary end points (length of ICU stay, days of mechanical ventilation and need for inotropes). Results The heart rate at the end of the study was significantly lower in survived patients in group I with mean value of 80.06+9.05 beats/minute compared to mean value of 102.22+7.58 beats/minute in the died patients in the same group (P=0.003). The mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) in studied patients, was not significantly different between the two groups on admission (P=0.099) and on the 1st day (P=0.172) the significant differences started to appear on the 2nd day (P=0.003), and over the whole period of observation till the end point of the study as the mean value of 83.31+16.90 in group I compared to mean value of 72.0+16.07 in group II (P=<0.021), regarding the comparison between the survived and died patients in group I, on admission there was no statistically significant difference between them (p 0.213) while by the end point of the study, there was a statistically significant difference being higher in survived patients with mean value of 95.38+3.38 compared to mean value of 61.44+2.70 in died patients (P<0.001). Regarding the occurrence of septic shock, it was less in group I as 40% compared to 72% in group II (P=0.023), group I had longer ICU stay (5.0 to 24.0 days) compared to group II (7.0 to 20.0 days), with a statistically significant difference (P=0.029). The duration of mechanical ventilation days (P=0.001), as longer in group II compared group I (group I= 8.37±3.43 days, group II=12.0±3.21 days). The mortality was lower in group I about 36% compared to 68% in group II with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P= 0.024). Conclusion The administration of bisoprolol to patients with severe sepsis decrease the mortality, length of stay in ICU, days of mechanical ventilation and improves tissue perfusion without significant effect on hemodynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]