The efficacy and safety of 25 μg or 50 μg oral misoprostol versus 25 μg vaginal misoprostol given at 4‐ or 6‐hourly intervals for induction of labour in women at or beyond term with live singleton pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

MLA

Yenuberi, Hilda, et al. “The Efficacy and Safety of 25 Μg or 50 Μg Oral Misoprostol versus 25 Μg Vaginal Misoprostol given at 4‐ or 6‐hourly Intervals for Induction of Labour in Women at or beyond Term with Live Singleton Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 164, no. 2, Feb. 2024, pp. 482–98. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14970.

APA

Yenuberi, H., Mathews, J., George, A., Benjamin, S., Rathore, S., Tirkey, R., & Tharyan, P. (2024). The efficacy and safety of 25 μg or 50 μg oral misoprostol versus 25 μg vaginal misoprostol given at 4‐ or 6‐hourly intervals for induction of labour in women at or beyond term with live singleton pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 164(2), 482–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14970

Chicago

Yenuberi, Hilda, Jiji Mathews, Anne George, Santosh Benjamin, Swati Rathore, Richa Tirkey, and Prathap Tharyan. 2024. “The Efficacy and Safety of 25 Μg or 50 Μg Oral Misoprostol versus 25 Μg Vaginal Misoprostol given at 4‐ or 6‐hourly Intervals for Induction of Labour in Women at or beyond Term with Live Singleton Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis.” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 164 (2): 482–98. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14970.