Back to Search Start Over

Safety and short‐term outcomes of robotic‐assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia in pioneering hospitals in Japan: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Authors :
Okamoto, Nobuhiko
Misawa, Takeyuki
Shimada, Gen
Saito, Takuya
Takiguchi, Shuji
Imamura, Kiyotaka
Ohuchi, Masakazu
Tanida, Tsukasa
Watanobe, Ikuo
Fujii, Tsutomu
Takemasa, Ichiro
Mizutani, Fumitoshi
Matsubara, Taketo
Hayakawa, Shunsuke
Watanabe, Toru
Okuya, Koichi
Takahashi, Hideki
Horikawa, Masahiro
Wakabayashi, Go
Source :
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. Jan2024, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p1-8. 8p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the safety and short‐term outcomes of robotic‐assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia in 12 pioneering hospitals in Japan. Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent robotic‐assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair between September 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021 were collected. Primary outcome measures were intra‐operative adverse events and post‐operative complications, whereas secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes, including chronic pain, recurrence, and learning curve. Results: In total, 307 patients were included. One case of inferior epigastric arterial injury was reported; no cases of bowel or bladder injury were reported. Thirty‐five seromas were observed, including four (1.3%) cases that required aspiration. The median operative time of a unilateral case was 108 minutes (interquartile range: 89.8–125.5), and post‐operative pain was rated 1 (interquartile range: 0–2) on the numerical rating scale. In complicated cases, such as recurrent inguinal hernias and robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy‐associated hernias, dissection and suture were safely achieved, and no complications were observed, except for non‐symptomatic seroma. All patients underwent robotic procedures, and there was no chronic post‐operative inguinal pain, although one case of hernia recurrence was reported. Regarding the learning curve, plateau performance was achieved after 7–10 cases in terms of operative time (P <.001). Conclusion: Robotic‐assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair can be safely introduced in Japan. Regardless of the involvement of many surgeons, the mastery of robotic techniques was achieved relatively quickly. The advantage of robotic technology such as wristed instruments may expand the application of minimally invasive hernia repair for complicated cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17585902
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174762760
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.13251