Back to Search Start Over

Quantifying changes in shoulder orientation between the prone and supine positions from magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors :
Pan, Fangchao
Khoo, Kejia
Maso Talou, Gonzalo D.
Song, Freda
McGhee, Deirdre
Doyle, Anthony J.
Nielsen, Poul M.F.
Nash, Martyn P.
Babarenda Gamage, Thiranja P.
Source :
Clinical Biomechanics. Jan2024, Vol. 111, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Predicting breast tissue motion using biomechanical models can provide navigational guidance during breast cancer treatment procedures. These models typically do not account for changes in posture between procedures. Difference in shoulder position can alter the shape of the pectoral muscles and breast. A greater understanding of the differences in the shoulder orientation between prone and supine could improve the accuracy of breast biomechanical models. 19 landmarks were placed on the sternum, clavicle, scapula, and humerus of the shoulder girdle in prone and supine breast MRIs (N = 10). These landmarks were used in an optimization framework to fit subject-specific skeletal models and compare joint angles of the shoulder girdle between these positions. The mean Euclidean distance between joint locations from the fitted skeletal model and the manually identified joint locations was 15.7 mm ± 2.7 mm. Significant differences were observed between prone and supine. Compared to supine position, the shoulder girdle in the prone position had the lateral end of the clavicle in more anterior translation (i.e., scapula more protracted) (P < 0.05), the scapula in more protraction (P < 0.01), the scapula in more upward rotation (associated with humerus elevation) (P < 0.05); and the humerus more elevated (P < 0.05) for both the left and right sides. Shoulder girdle orientation was found to be different between prone and supine. These differences would affect the shape of multiple pectoral muscles, which would affect breast shape and the accuracy of biomechanical models. • Differences in shoulder girdle joint orientations between prone and supine MRI • Personalization of a multi-body skeletal model using manually identified landmarks • Significant differences were found in the clavicle, scapula, and humerus orientation. • Shoulder position needs to be accounted for when performing biomechanics simulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02680033
Volume :
111
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Biomechanics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174759988
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106157