Clinical Experience of Axillary Radiotherapy for Node-positive Breast Cancer.

Patients with breast cancer who have positive lymph nodes are currently recommended axillary node clearance (ANC) or regional nodal irradiation (RNI). ANC is associated with complications such as lymphoedema, brachial plexopathy and shoulder stiffness. The AMAROS Group showed RNI to be non-inferior to ANC with regards to survival and recurrence, and with a better quality of life. We conducted a large real-world population study to show our centre's experience with the use of RNI and to contribute to the current discussion around the management of node-positive breast cancer. We evaluated patients who received RNI as opposed to ANC between 2006 and 2009 (n = 190). Patients had a range of cancer subtypes/grades. All had positive axillary disease, identified by axillary node sampling or sentinel lymph node biopsy. Systemic therapy was given as per standard protocol. Our data were compared with those of patients who had RNI (n = 681) in AMAROS. Patients were followed up retrospectively and overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, distant metastasis-free survival, locoregional recurrence and toxicity were recorded, including lymphoedema, brachial plexopathy and shoulder stiffness. Survival analysis was performed on R via the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed. Toxicity data were reported as percentages. Patients meeting POSNOC trial criteria (one to two positive sentinel lymph nodes, macrometastasis, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy) including if oestrogen receptor-positive (stratified POSNOC) were identified for subgroup analysis in the regression model. Locoregional recurrence was 3.16% versus AMAROS RNI of 1.82%. Overall survival was slightly lower in our population, but cancer-specific survival was higher than AMAROS. Lymphoedema rates were 5.8% versus AMAROS 11% in RNI and 23% in ANC arms, respectively. Brachial plexopathy was 1.6% and arm/shoulder stiffness 7.4%. AMAROS conducted a quality of life survey pertaining to arm/shoulder stiffness, mobility and function, which seemed to affect about 18% in the RNI arm. Univariate analysis revealed POSNOC status, especially if also oestrogen receptor-positive, to be a low risk group with hazard ratio 0.42 (0.20–0.83, P = 0.015). Extracapsular extension of lymph node metastasis was a poor prognostic factor; hazard ratio 4.39 (1.45–14.0, P = 0.009). We support the conclusion of the AMAROS trial with survival and recurrence following RNI being non-inferior to ANC, and with similarly favourable toxicity data. We support the continuing use of RNI as a treatment option for patients with node-positive breast cancer. Further research is required to answer the key questions regarding personalised management for node-positive breast cancer, with regards to de-escalation and also intensification for the patients exhibiting adverse tumour biology. • Real world data from our centre shows similar outcomes with regards to survival and toxicity as the AMAROS Group. • We have found that the POSNOC criteria , when applied to our dataset, are a lower risk group. • We suggest de-escalation of multimodality treatment for low risk node positive breast cancer with personalisation of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]