Response of soil water to long-term revegetation, topography, and precipitation on the Chinese Loess Plateau.

• Artificial restored shrub and grass aggravated soil deficit but they got replenished better under large rainfall. • The effects of revegetation and topography on SWS varied greatly with rainfall. • Water-intensive vegetation species should be used cautiously for revegetation. The Chinese Loess Plateau (CLP) rose to prominence for its fragmented terrain and fragile ecosystems. Large-scale revegetation was applied to control soil and water loss there. However, revegetation resulted in unexpected water shortages. In this study, we investigated the temporal-spatial distribution of soil water in the northern CLP based on 13-year soil water content (SWC) data of four different revegetation types on a loessial slope and 4-year data of a gully system to study the response of soil water to long-term revegetation, topography, and precipitation. Results showed that in the 0–400 cm soil depth under shrub, grass, natural fallow, and millet, soil water storage (SWS) was –102.8, –129.3, 54.9, and 39.3 mm higher after 13-year of restoration, respectively. Although soil water under shrubs- and grasslands became more replenished under high precipitation, planting these water-intensive vegetation types aggravated soil desiccation. The gully intensified soil water spatial heterogeneity, with mean SWS within 0–480 cm soil depth of 902, 712, and 746 mm at the gully bottom, edge, and bank, respectively. The deviation index among the four revegetation types and among gully bottom, edge, and bank were 0.43 and 0.26, respectively, which indicated that revegetation types had a more obvious effect on SWS. Given that more concentrated rainfall under global climate change, both revegetation type and topography should be considered during ecological restoration in semi-arid areas. These findings can deepen our comprehension of the hydrological processes on the CLP and provide a reference for the development of ecological restoration policies under future climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]