Back to Search Start Over

Determining Capillary Pore–Size Distribution of Soil from Soil–Water Retention Curve.

Authors :
Luo, Shengmin
Zhou, Baochun
Likos, William J.
Lu, Ning
Source :
Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering. Feb2024, Vol. 150 Issue 2, p1-14. 14p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Pore-size distribution (PSD) of soil is a fundamental property that determines flows of water, heat, chemicals, and electricity and controls distributions of stress and deformation. PSD can be intrinsically related to the soil–water retention curve (SWRC), which is a constitutive relationship describing how the soil skeleton retains pore water via adsorption and capillarity. A general framework to quantify soil's PSD is proposed by first fitting an analytical SWRC model to experimental water retention curves that explicitly separate the SWRC into an adsorptive SWRC and a capillary SWRC. The PSD is then estimated at incremental steps by combining the capillary SWRC and the conventional Young–Laplace equation relating capillary pressure to pore size. Cumulative and density PSD curves for 11 soils covering a wide spectrum of soil types are determined and compared with the PSD functions independently measured using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Good agreement is observed in the estimated pore size range, distribution pattern, and peak position determined from the two different methods. Differences observed in the methods are attributed to differences inherent in the use of wetting and nonwetting fluids to probe the pore space. The SWRC-based method generally characterizes pore sizes ranging from 100 to 0.02 μm with a major peak located within a pore diameter range of 1–10 μm. As the clay content increases, a secondary peak becomes evident at smaller pore sizes (about 0.01–0.1 μm), where the bimodal pattern reflects the dual-porosity microstructure commonly observed for clayey soils. For soils containing swelling clays, PSD can change substantially with variation in water content; thus, the water-based method is more appropriate than MIP for applications to geotechnical engineering practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10900241
Volume :
150
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174278815
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1061/JGGEFK.GTENG-11647