Back to Search Start Over

A Cluster Randomized Trial of Primary Care Practice Redesign to Integrate Behavioral Health for Those Who Need It Most: Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Authors :
Littenberg, Benjamin
Clifton, Jessica
Crocker, Abigail M.
Baldwin, Laura-Mae
Bonnell, Levi N.
Breshears, Ryan E.
Callas, Peter
Chakravarti, Prama
Clark/Keefe, Kelly
Cohen, Deborah J.
deGruy, Frank V.
Eidt-Pearson, Lauren
Elder, William
Fox, Chester
Frisbie, Sylvie
Hekman, Katie
Hitt, Juvena
Jewiss, Jennifer
Kaelber, David C.
Kelley, Kairn Stetler
Source :
Annals of Family Medicine. Nov/Dec2023, Vol. 21 Issue 6, p483-495. 13p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

PURPOSE Patient outcomes can improve when primary care and behavioral health providers use a collaborative system of care, but integrating these services is difficult. We tested the effectiveness of a practice intervention for improving patient outcomes by enhancing integrated behavioral health (IBH) activities. METHODS We conducted a pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. The intervention combined practice redesign, quality improvement coaching, provider and staff education, and collaborative learning. At baseline and 2 years, staff at 42 primary care practices completed the Practice Integration Profile (PIP) as a measure of IBH. Adult patients with multiple chronic medical and behavioral conditions completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29) survey. Primary outcomes were the change in 8 PROMIS-29 domain scores. Secondary outcomes included change in level of integration. RESULTS Intervention assignment had no effect on change in outcomes reported by 2,426 patients who completed both baseline and 2-year surveys. Practices assigned to the intervention improved PIP workflow scores but not PIP total scores. Baseline PIP total score was significantly associated with patient-reported function, independent of intervention. Active practices that completed intervention workbooks (n = 13) improved patient-reported outcomes and practice integration (P = .05) compared with other active practices (n = 7). CONCLUSION Intervention assignment had no effect on change in patient outcomes; however, we did observe improved patient outcomes among practices that entered the study with greater IBH. We also observed more improvement of integration and patient outcomes among active practices that completed the intervention compared to active practices that did not. Additional research is needed to understand how implementation efforts to enhance IBH can best reach patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15441709
Volume :
21
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Annals of Family Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174026579
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3027