Two evaluations on Ontology-style relation annotations.

In this paper, we propose an Ontology-Style Relation (OSR) annotation approach. In conventional Relation Extraction (RE) datasets, relations are annotated as a link between two entity mentions. In contrast, in our OSR annotation, a relation is annotated as a relation mention (i.e. , not a link but a node) and rdfs:domain and rdfs:range links are annotated from the relation mention to its argument entity mentions. This approach has the following benefits: (1) the relation annotations can be easily converted to Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples to populate an Ontology, (2) some part of conventional RE tasks can be tackled as Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks, and the relation classes are limited to several RDF properties, and (3) OSR annotations can be used for clear documentations of Ontology contents. We conducted two kinds of evaluation to investigate effects of OSR annotation. We converted (1) an in-house corpus of Japanese Rules of the Road (RoR) in conventional annotations into the OSR annotations and built a novel OSR-RoR corpus and (2) SemEval-2010 Task 8 dataset into the OSR annotations (called OSR-SemEval corpus). We compared the NER and RE performance using neural NER/RE tool DyGIE++ on the conventional and OSR annotations. The experimental results show that the OSR annotations make the RE task easier while introducing slight complexity into the NER task. • The relation annotations can be easily converted to Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples to populate an Ontology. • Some part of conventional RE tasks can be tackled as Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks. The relation classes are limited to several RDF properties. • OSR annotations can be used for clear documentations of Ontology contents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]