Incorporating climate justice into adaptation planning: The case of San Francisco.

There is growing pressure for cities to plan for and take action on climate change in equitable and just ways. Scholars, however, continue to debate what justice looks like in practice, and cities struggle to plan for and implement climate justice. This article investigates the case of San Francisco, a forerunner in climate action and a city experiencing profound inequality. Our research employs an analytical framework that assesses how and to what extent climate justice is incorporated into climate adaptation planning. This study analyzes 20 years of adaptation efforts in San Francisco and is informed by interviews with city planners and agency staff. Our research has found that San Francisco's approach to climate planning has shifted in recent years from focusing primarily on technology and science to addressing concerns of justice and the needs of residents. While San Francisco has made efforts to develop climate justice plans, further inquiry is needed to study the challenges of fully integrating climate justice into implementation. The insights gained from this case of San Francisco and our analytical framework can inform future urban climate action plans and further the debate around climate justice in cities from the Global North. • Cities, such as San Francisco (United States), are increasingly incorporating climate justice into adaptation planning. • Local government leadership, funding, and regulation lay the groundwork for climate justice in adaptation planning. • We present a framework to examine how and the extent to which climate justice is incorporated into adaptation planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]