Comparison of image quality, contrast administration, and radiation doses in pediatric abdominal dual-layer detector dual-energy CT using propensity score matching analysis.

• Our study compares DECT and SECT in pediatrics using propensity score matching. • The image quality of DECT was not statistically different from SECT. • The radiation dose of DECT was not statistically different from SECT. • DECT reduced contrast administration by 10% compared with SECT. • DECT could be used for children without excessive radiation or poor image quality. To compare the image quality, contrast administration, and radiation dose between single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) in pediatric patients. From March to December 2021, children who underwent abdominal SECT or DECT were retrospectively included in this study. The DECT group received 10–30 % less contrast than the routine dose. CT images were obtained at hepatic venous phase using a routine reconstruction method (iDose4). DECT scans were additionally reconstructed with a virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 40 and 65 keV. Quantitative image evaluations compared the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver, portal vein, and pancreas. Qualitative analysis assessed degree of contrast enhancement, lesion or organ conspicuity, image noise, artificiality, and overall image quality. Among 318 patients, 112 (median age, 16 years; 56 in each group) were included after propensity score matching. Compared with the SECT group, DECT group with iDose4 demonstrated lower CNRs and SNRs, while VMI at 40 or 65 keV showed no significant difference. In qualitative analysis, iDose4 produced higher scores on artificiality, and VMI at 40 keV demonstrated superior contrast enhancement and lesion conspicuity in the DECT group. Overall image quality was higher with VMI 65 keV among the DECT patients, and there was no significant difference compared to SECT. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) did not differ significantly between the two groups (median, 2.8 mGy vs. 2.9 mGy; p = 0.802). The injected contrast volume was reduced by 10 % in the DECT group. Pediatric abdominal DECT with reduced contrast administration showed no significant differences in image quality and radiation dose compared to SECT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]