Back to Search Start Over

External validation of three prognostic scores for brain metastasis velocity in patients treated with intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors :
Christ, Sebastian M.
Borsky, Kim
Kraft, Johannes
Frei, Simon
Willmann, Jonas
Ahmadsei, Maiwand
Kirchner, Corinna
Stark Schneebeli, Luisa Sabrina
Camilli, Federico
Tanadini-Lang, Stephanie
Rahman, Rifaquat
Aizer, Ayal A.
Guckenberger, Matthias
Andratschke, Nicolaus
Mayinger, Michael
Source :
Radiotherapy & Oncology. Dec2023, Vol. 189, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

• BMV is a novel prognostic score for OS in patients with BMs from solid cancers. • To date, three versions of the BMV have been proposed: Classic , initial and volume-based. • This is the first study to attempt to externally validate all three BMV scores in a large cohort. • cBMV and iBMV were successfully validated, while validation of vBMV was not achieved. • External validation and easy transferability suggest clinical potential for cBMV and iBMV. Brain metastasis velocity (BMV) has been proposed as a prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in patients with brain metastases (BMs). In this study, we conducted an external validation and comparative assessment of the performance of all three BMV scores. Patients treated with intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for BM at a single center between 2014 and 2018 were identified. Where possible, all three BMV scores were calculated. Log-rank tests and linear, logistic and Cox regression analysis were used for validation and predictor identification of OS. For 333 of 384 brain metastasis patients, at least one BMV score could be calculated. In a sub-group of 187 patients, "classic" BMV was validated as categorical (p < 0.0001) and continuous variable (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.02–1.03; p < 0.0001). In a sub-group of 284 patients, "initial" BMV was validated as categorical variable (high-risk vs. low-risk; p < 0.01), but not as continuous variable (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.99–1.04; p = 0.224). "Volume-based" BMV could not be validated in a sub-group of 104 patients. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, iBMV (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.01–3.38; p < 0.05) and cBMV (HR 2.32; 95% CI 1.15 4.68; p < 0.05) were predictors for OS for intermediate-risk patients after first SRT and first DBFs, respectively. cBMV proved to be the dominant predictor for OS for high-risk patients (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.30–6.91; p < 0.05). This study externally validated cBMV and iBMV as prognostic scores for OS in patients treated with SRT for BMs whereas validation of vBMV was not achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01678140
Volume :
189
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Radiotherapy & Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173853358
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109917