Back to Search Start Over

Impurity gas monitoring using ultrasonic sensing and neural networks: forward and inverse problems.

Authors :
Zhuang, Bozhou
Gencturk, Bora
Oberai, Assad
Ramaswamy, Harisankar
Meyer, Ryan
Source :
Measurement (02632241). Dec2023, Vol. 223, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

• Established a comprehensive experimental dataset for analyzing impurity gases in helium. • Used ANNs to develop a forward model that can predict ultrasonic responses and time-of-flight (TOF). • The forward model served as a digital twin, surrogate model, and optimization aid. • Employed CNN for solving the inverse problem, predicting impurity gas concentrations. • Invers model offers a data-driven solution and enabling real-time monitoring. Ultrasonic sensing is a non-invasive technique for monitoring impurity gas composition in various industrial applications where safety and regulatory compliance are crucial. In this study, ultrasonic sensing and neural networks were used to analyze impurity gases (i.e., air and argon) in helium. An experimental platform was established to acquire ultrasonic data. In the forward problem, an artificial neural network (ANN) model was used to forecast the response and time-of-flight (TOF) based on the excitation, and argon and air concentrations. The inverse problem was solved using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to predict the argon and air concentrations given the ultrasonic response and excitation. The results showed that the ANN accurately predicted the ultrasonic response and the change in TOF with concentration. As the air concentration was increased from 0 to 9.8%, the TOF sensitivity to detect argon decreased by 39.8% and 16.1% from ANN and sound speed theory, respectively. The CNN demonstrated high accuracy in predicting concentrations for inputs in the testing dataset. The application of the trained CNN indicated that it over-predicts air concentration while under-predicting the argon concentration. To improve accuracy, the predicted air and argon concentrations should be corrected by -0.992% and 1.027% bias, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02632241
Volume :
223
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Measurement (02632241)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173697766
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113822