Comparative effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions for urinary incontinence in older women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

• Urinary incontinence seriously affects older women's health and quality of life. • Nonsurgical interventions were recommended as a priority before invasive procedures. • Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine was currently the optimal selection. • Future clinical studies on urinary incontinence require rigorous program design. To compare the effectiveness of existing nonsurgical interventions to improve or cure urinary incontinence in older women. Five English databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Library) were searched from January 1, 2018, until August 27, 2023. Studies published before 2018 were directly extracted from a review published in 2019 on a similar research question. Three Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and SinoMed) were searched from January 1, 2000, until August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials of nonsurgical interventions for women aged ≥ 60 years with urinary incontinence were considered eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of improvement and cure. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed, with the pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) being reported. There were 15 intervention categories among the included 32 randomized controlled trials for older women with urinary incontinence. The combination of behavioral therapy with other interventions, including Chinese herbal medicine, electrical stimulation, and acupuncture were effective for both improvement and cure rates. Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine was the most effective intervention category for both improvement and cure rates. Behavioral therapy plus Chinese herbal medicine was currently the optimal selection for the management of older women with urinary incontinence. However, the clinicians should carefully consider the effectiveness and quality of evidence because of the limited quality and quantity of the randomized controlled trials included. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]