The Iconicity Ring Hypothesis Bridges the Gap Between Symbol Grounding and Linguistic Relativity.

Kemmerer captured the drastic change in theories of word meaning representations, contrasting the view that word meaning representations are amodal and universal, with the view that they are grounded and language‐specific. However, he does not address how language can be simultaneously grounded and language‐specific. Here, we approach this question from the perspective of language acquisition and evolution. We argue that adding a new element—iconicity—is critically beneficial and offer the iconicity ring hypothesis, which explains how language‐specific, secondary iconicity might emerge from biologically grounded and universally shared iconicity in the course of language acquisition and evolution. To complement Kemmerer's main argument that language can be grounded to body but simultaneously language specific, we offer the iconicity ring hypothesis, which explains how language‐specific, secondary iconicity might emerge from biologically grounded and universally shared iconicity in the course of language acquisition and evolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]