Cyclopentane hydrate wettability measurements used to evaluate the efficacy of oil natural surfactants using ultra-low volume samples.

[Display omitted] • Hydrate wettability controls oil plugging potential. • Hydrate wettability gives low-cost initial screening. • Increasing the oil concentration decreases the hydrate wettability. • Wettability decreases with an increased amount of asphaltenes. • Polar oil fractions contribute more to hydrate wettability than non-polar fractions. Hydrate surface wettability is a fundamental aspect to better understand agglomeration present in oil bearing petroleum pipelines. Coupling these measurements with hydrate film growth gives further information on kinetic effects that may also be present from natural surfactants in different oils. In situ measurements of wettability (quantified by the contact angle) and film growth rates were performed on cyclopentane hydrate surfaces at atmospheric pressure and subcooling of 4 °C. Contact angle and film growth results were obtained for the baseline system (pure cyclopentane), one model oil, and seventeen natural oils (diluted to 0.02 vol% in cyclopentane). Results showed a wide variety of contact angles and film growth values where higher asphaltene contents in the oils corresponded to higher contact angles and lower film growth rates, thought to be from better alignment of natural surfactant molecules at the hydrate/hydrocarbon interface. It was also shown for select oils that increasing the oil concentration in the cyclopentane increases the contact angle and decreases the film growth rate compared to the baseline system. For select oils that had higher contact angles, increasing the water content of the system decreases their contact angle and film growth compared to the baseline system. Isolating different oil fractions for select oils also shows which fractions tend to play a larger role in wettability behavior. Typically, the fractions with more surface active components (asphaltene and resins) are shown to contribute to the higher contact angle and slower film growth rates for select oils. Evidence of the competition between film growth and capillary suction of water into the hydrate has been shown, and a mechanistic breakdown of three different transient scenarios has been proposed. Each of these observed interfacial behaviors gives information on what can be expected from larger scale phenomena, including hydrate agglomeration, with very small oil samples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]