Back to Search
Start Over
Thinking inside the box: Investigating peak storm response in a simplified outdoor slope setup.
- Source :
-
Journal of Hydrology . Oct2023:Part B, Vol. 625, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Hillslopes are the fundamental building blocks of catchments, however, fully disentangling their hydrological response remains an outstanding challenge. In natural settings, hillslope hydrology is challenged by the interplay of several factors, such as, heterogeneous morphology, vegetation, and complex soils. Herein, we attempt to clarify the mechanisms that control the rainfall-runoff relationship by investigating the response of an artificial outdoor slope setup with uniform geometry, soil properties, topography, and in the absence of vegetation located in a Mediterranean climate. Based on the analysis of more than 100 storms across six consecutive hydrological years, our results demonstrate that either pre-event soil water content or rainfall conditions alone are not sufficient to explain the slope response. Seasonality played a major role through soil moisture conditions, and pre-event soil moisture, peak rainfall intensity and rainfall duration influenced the slope runoff response. Observations suggest that in fall and winter subsurface flow was the prevalent runoff mechanism, while infiltration excess overland flow mostly occurred in the dry season. Our findings show that continuous measurement of runoff could be beneficial to understand the peak rainfall-peak runoff relationship. • Rainfall-runoff studied in artificial slope through more than 100 storms. • Peak rainfall intensity, rain distribution and soil moisture influence runoff. • Occurrence of runoff before peak rainfall beneficial to predict peak runoff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00221694
- Volume :
- 625
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Hydrology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 172365821
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130064