Development of the snow- and ice-accounting routine (SIAR).

[Display omitted] • An enhanced degree-day model is developed based on a flexible modeling approach. • Calibration and control were based on local and remotely-sensed snow data, and runoff. • The development resulted in a one-free parameter snow- and ice-accounting routine. • The model is statistically equivalent or better than the alternative models tested. This paper evaluates the degrees of freedom and complexity warranted in temperature-index models to jointly simulate local snow measurements, remotely-sensed snow cover and runoff in mountainous areas. To address this issue, the snow- and ice-accounting routine (SIAR) on top of the GR4J model was developed on a dataset covering 17 mountainous catchments (45 to 3580 km2) in the French Alps and Pyrenees. Model calibration and control were based on streamflow series, fractional snow cover (FSC) computed from MODIS snow products and at least one chronicle of local measurements of snow water equivalent (SWE) acquired in each catchment for the period 2004–2016. SIAR was applied according to an adaptable number of elevation bands and different parametrizations ranging from 11 free parameters (precipitation orographic correction, temperature lapse rate, variation in the temperature lapse rate, snowfall adjustment, rainfall lapse rate, thermal inertia of the snow pack, constant and variable part of the degree-day snow melt factor, degree-day ice melt factor, 2-parameter hysteresis between SWE and FSC), to only fixed parameters. Results showed that the one-free-parameter SIAR is as efficient as more parametrized versions in simulating both local and distributed snow dynamics as well as runoff. Interestingly, using SIAR without any free parameters by fixing the snowfall adjustment to a median value of 60% only led to slight impairment of local SWE dynamics. Certain processes represented in SIAR (glacier-component, sublimation, simple energy balance, snowpack cold-content, variable melt factor) were then alternatively turned off to justify those retained in its final version. The modeling performances were also compared by applying SIAR with different distribution options ranging from full distribution according to 0.25 km2 cells to lumped mode. A number of equal-area elevation bands according to the catchment hypsometry proved to be a good compromise as it allowed snow and runoff simulations of similar accuracy to the full distribution mode, while limiting computational time. Finally, SIAR was compared with the Cemaneige snow routine, which showed its modeling performance was better. These findings suggest that it is possible, and even advisable, to limit the number of free parameters in temperature-index models in order to reduce problems of over-parameterization and equifinality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]