Back to Search Start Over

Effect of different PD‐1 inhibitor combination therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors :
Lei, Zhengqing
Ma, Weihu
Si, Anfeng
Zhang, Yuhua
Yang, Facai
Yu, Qiushi
Tang, Haolan
Xiao, Qianru
Zhou, Jiahua
Wang, Kui
Tang, Yufu
Han, Tao
Yin, Guowen
Chen, Jinhong
Liu, Xiufeng
Zhao, Hua
Yu, Decai
Luo, Tao
Wang, Qing
Yan, Maolin
Source :
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. Sep2023, Vol. 58 Issue 6, p611-622. 12p. 1 Diagram, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Summary: Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy offers a new option for treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). Aim: To compare the effect of different anti‐PD‐1 combination therapies as the first‐line treatments for uICC. Methods: This study included 318 patients who received chemotherapy alone (Chemo), anti‐PD‐1 plus chemotherapy (ICI‐chemo), anti‐PD‐1 plus targeted therapy (ICI‐target) or anti‐PD‐1 plus targeted therapy and chemotherapy (ICI‐target‐chemo) as first line for uICC from 22 centres in China. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: Patients with ICI‐chemo (median PFS [mPFS], 6.3 months; HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42–0.88; p = 0.008; median OS [mOS], 10.7 months; HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.39–0.94; p = 0.026), ICI‐target (7.2 months; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36–0.80; p = 0.002; 15.8 months; HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.35–0.84; p = 0.006) or ICI‐target‐chemo (6.9 months; HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47–0.90; p = 0.009; 14.4 months; HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31–0.70; p < 0.001) achieved better clinical outcomes than those with Chemo (3.8 months; 9.3 months). ICI‐target was not inferior to ICI‐chemo in survival outcomes (HR for PFS: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.55–1.42; p = 0.614; HR for OS: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.51–1.55; p = 0.680). ICI‐target‐chemo yielded similar prognoses as ICI‐chemo (HR for PFS: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.70–1.62; p = 0.764; HR for OS: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.45–1.31; p = 0.328) and ICI‐target (HR for PFS: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.77–1.88; p = 0.413; HR for OS: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.51–1.47; p = 0.583) but resulted in more adverse events (p < 0.001; p = 0.010). Multivariable and propensity score analyses supported these findings. Conclusions: Among patients with uICC, ICI‐chemo or ICI‐target provided more survival benefits than Chemo while achieving comparable prognoses and fewer adverse events than ICI‐target‐chemo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02692813
Volume :
58
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
170725473
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17623