Dietary Ruminant Enteric Methane Mitigation Strategies: Current Findings, Potential Risks and Applicability.

Simple Summary: This article aims to explore various ruminant enteric methane mitigation strategies and delve into their underlying modes of action. Furthermore, it addresses the importance of ruminant enteric methane mitigation in the context of climate change and its potential impact on global warming. The article also highlights the need for interdisciplinary research and collaboration to develop comprehensive and practical solutions. By considering the ecological, economic, and social implications of these strategies, policymakers and stakeholders can make informed decisions to reduce methane emissions while ensuring the sustainability of livestock production systems. This review examines the current state of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of different dietary ruminant enteric methane mitigation strategies and their modes of action together with the issues discussed regarding the potential harms/risks and applicability of such strategies. By investigating these strategies, we can enhance our understanding of the mechanisms by which they influence methane production and identify promising approaches for sustainable mitigation of methane emissions. Out of all nutritional strategies, the use of 3-nitrooxypropanol, red seaweed, tannins, saponins, essential oils, nitrates, and sulfates demonstrates the potential to reduce emissions and receives a lot of attention from the scientific community. The use of certain additives as pure compounds is challenging under certain conditions, such as pasture-based systems, so the potential use of forages with sufficient amounts of plant secondary metabolites is also explored. Additionally, improved forage quality (maturity and nutrient composition) might help to further reduce emissions. Red seaweed, although proven to be very effective in reducing emissions, raises some questions regarding the volatility of the main active compound, bromoform, and challenges regarding the cultivation of the seaweed. Other relatively new methods of mitigation, such as the use of cyanogenic glycosides, are also discussed in this article. Together with nitrates, cyanogenic glycosides pose serious risks to animal health, but research has proven their efficacy and safety when control measures are taken. Furthermore, the risks of nitrate use can be minimized by using probiotics. Some of the discussed strategies, namely monensin or halogenated hydrocarbons (as pure compounds), demonstrate efficacy but are unlikely to be implemented widely because of legal restrictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]