Back to Search Start Over

The role of proximal versus distal stomach resection in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors :
Kulkarni, Bhushan V.
LaSance, Kathleen
Sorrell, Joyce E.
Lemen, Lisa
Woods, Stephen C.
Seeley, Randy J.
Sandoval, Darleen
Source :
American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology. Nov2016, Vol. 311 Issue 5, pR979-R987. 9p. 7 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

The mechanisms involved in the weight loss seen after vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) are not clear. The rat stomach has two morphologically and functionally distinct proximal and distal parts. The rat model for VSG involves complete removal of the proximal part and 80% removal of the distal part along the greater curvature. The purpose of this study was to understand the potential independent contributions of removal of these distinct gastric sections to VSG outcomes. We prepared four surgical groups of male Long-Evans rats: VSG, sham surgery (control), selective proximal section removal (PR), and selective distal section removal (DR). Gastric emptying rate (GER) was highest after VSG compared with all other groups. However, PR, in turn, had significantly greater GER compared with both DR and sham groups. The surgery-induced weight loss followed the same pattern with VSG causing the greatest weight loss and PR having greater weight loss compared with DR and sham groups. The results were robust for rats fed regular chow or a high-fat diet. Body mass analysis revealed that the weight loss was due to the loss of fat mass, and there was no change in lean mass after the surgeries. In conclusion, removal of the proximal stomach contributes to most, but not all, of the physiological impact of VSG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03636119
Volume :
311
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
170031212
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00125.2016