Back to Search Start Over

Patents and Regulatory Exclusivities on GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

Authors :
Alhiary, Rasha
Kesselheim, Aaron S.
Gabriele, Sarah
Beall, Reed F.
Tu, S. Sean
Feldman, William B.
Source :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 8/15/2023, Vol. 330 Issue 7, p650-657. 8p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Key Points: Question: How have manufacturers of brand-name glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists used the patent and regulatory system to extend periods of market exclusivity? Findings: Brand-name manufacturers obtained a median of 19.5 patents per GLP-1 receptor agonist and secured a median of 18.3 years of expected protection; more than half of all patents were obtained on the delivery devices rather than active ingredients. No generic competition has yet emerged on these products. Meaning: Long periods of market exclusivity on GLP-1 receptor agonists underscore the need for patent and regulatory reform on drug-device combinations. Importance: Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists were first approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in 2005. Demand for these drugs has increased rapidly in recent years, as indications have expanded, but they remain expensive. Objective: To analyze how manufacturers of brand-name GLP-1 receptor agonists have used the patent and regulatory systems to extend periods of market exclusivity. Evidence Review: The annual US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations was used to identify GLP-1 receptor agonists approved from 2005 to 2021 and to record patents and nonpatent statutory exclusivities listed for each product. Google Patents was used to extract additional data on patents, including whether each was obtained on the delivery device or another aspect of the product. The primary outcome was the duration of expected protection from generic competition, defined as the time elapsed from FDA approval until expiration of the last-to-expire patent or regulatory exclusivity. Findings: On the 10 GLP-1 receptor agonists included in the cohort, drug manufacturers listed with the FDA a median of 19.5 patents (IQR, 9.0-25.8) per product, including a median of 17 patents (IQR, 8.3-22.8) filed before FDA approval and 1.5 (IQR, 0-2.8) filed after FDA approval. Fifty-four percent of all patents listed on GLP-1 receptor agonists were on the delivery devices rather than active ingredients. Manufacturers augmented patent protection with a median of 2 regulatory exclusivities (IQR, 0-3) obtained at approval and 1 (IQR, 0.3-4.3) added after approval. The median total duration of expected protection after FDA approval, when accounting for both preapproval and postapproval patents and regulatory exclusivities, was 18.3 years (IQR, 16.0-19.4). No generic firm has successfully challenged patents on GLP-1 receptor agonists to gain FDA approval. Conclusions and Relevance: Patent and regulatory reform is needed to ensure timely generic entry of GLP-1 receptor agonists to the market. This Special Communication used data from the US Food and Drug Administration to analyze how manufacturers of brand-name glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have used patent and regulatory systems to extend periods of market exclusivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
330
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
170022384
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.13872