Prenatal Testing, Disability, and the Ethical Society.

The disability ground in the law can be thought to send a negative message about disabled people on the basis that disability is singled out as a reason for abortion, and also that abortion for this reason is allowed until birth. Footnotes 1 Many of the presentations from this conference are available to view here: 'Prenatal Testing, Disability, and the Ethical Society: Reflections Following I Crowter i ' at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCn48d2ExkzLBXad30RfiIdeGMEI7covI 2 I R (Crowter) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care i [2022] 1 WLR 2513. Both Heidi Crowter and Aidan Lea-Wilson have Down syndrome, although the issues raised in the case, and in the conference, relate to disability more broadly. This special issue of I The New Bioethics i follows on from a conference that took place at St Stephen's House, University of Oxford, in March 2022, on 'Prenatal Testing, Disability, and the Ethical Society: Reflections Following I Crowter i '.[1] The conference title refers to an important decision from the High Court, I R (Crowter) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care i .[2] In this case, the claimants challenged the law on abortion on the grounds of disability under the Abortion Act 1967, and their arguments raised a number of difficult ethical questions about prenatal testing, disability, and what kind of society we wish to have - and what is needed for it to be an "ethical society". [Extracted from the article]