Back to Search Start Over

Discrimination of piled-up neutron-gamma pulses using charge comparison method and neural network for CLYC detectors.

Authors :
Yi, Chuqi
Han, Jifeng
Song, Ruiqiang
Yan, Xiaoyu
Ren, Feixu
Luo, Xiaobing
Han, Zheng
Wen, Chun
Qu, Guofeng
Liu, Xingquan
Lin, Weiping
Wang, Peng
Fan, Yixiang
Qian, Sen
Wang, Zhigang
Tang, Gao
Qin, Laishun
Wang, Xu
Liu, Jizhen
Source :
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A. Oct2023, Vol. 1055, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

To realize neutron-gamma discrimination of piled-up pulses in high counting rate circumstances, the discrimination performance of the charge comparison method and three neural network models to actual piled-up pulses was studied in this paper. The neural network models, including a residual neural network (ResNet), a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a fully connected neural network (FCNN), were trained and tested by seven kinds of actual experimental data sets, which included the background signals (bg), non-piled-up neutron (n) and gamma (g) pulses as well as piled-up neutron + neutron (n + n), neutron + gamma (n + g), gamma + neutron (g + n), and gamma + gamma (g + g) pulses. The labels of the seven data sets were provided after discriminating by the charge comparison method. The results showed that the charge comparison method could be applied to discriminate piled-up neutron-gamma pulses with the Figure of Merit (FoM) value of 1.0. The integration length has been optimized to be different for piled-up and non-piled-up pulses, but follow the same criterion for neutron and gamma discrimination. The FoM values are worse than that of non-piled-up signals because the baseline fluctuation is very large under high counting rate conditions, which gives lots of interference to pulse shape discrimination. The ResNet model has the highest total prediction accuracy (93.85%) for the seven signal types, and through the comparison and analysis of the inconsistent events discriminated by the charge comparison method and the ResNet model, it is concluded that the discrimination result of the ResNet model is more accurate. These results indicate that both the charge comparison method and residual neural network can be used for complicated n/ γ discrimination under high counting rate conditions, and the residual neural network works better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01689002
Volume :
1055
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
169922349
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2023.168561