Investigating the factor structure and measurement invariance of the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire (EDE‐Q) in a community sample of gender minority adults from the United States.

Objective: The Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire (EDE‐Q) is one of the most widely used self‐report assessments of eating disorder symptoms. However, evidence indicates potential problems with its original factor structure and associated psychometric properties in a variety of populations, including gender minority populations. The aim of the current investigation was to explore several previously published EDE‐Q factor structures and to examine internal consistency and measurement invariance of the best‐fitting EDE‐Q model in a large community sample of gender minority adults. Methods: Data were drawn from 1567 adults (337 transgender men, 180 transgender women, and 1050 gender‐expansive individuals) who participated in The PRIDE Study, a large‐scale longitudinal cohort study of sexual and gender minorities from the United States. A series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were conducted to explore the fit of eight proposed EDE‐Q models; internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas, Omega coefficients) and measurement invariance (multi‐group CFA) were subsequently evaluated. Results: A brief seven‐item, three‐factor (dietary restraint, shape/weight overvaluation, body dissatisfaction) model of the EDE‐Q consistently evidenced the best fit across gender minority groups (transgender men, transgender women, gender‐expansive individuals). The internal consistencies of the three subscales were adequate in all groups, and measurement invariance across the groups was supported. Discussion: Taken together, these findings support the use of the seven‐item, three‐factor version of the EDE‐Q for assessing eating disorder symptomatology in gender minority populations. Future studies can confirm the current findings in focused examinations of the seven‐item, three‐factor EDE‐Q in diverse gender minority samples across race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age ranges. Public Significance Statement: Although transgender individuals have greater risk of developing an eating disorder, the factor structure of the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire, one of the most widely used eating disorder assessment measures, has not been explored in transgender adults. We found that a seven‐item model including three factors of dietary restraint, shape and weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction had the best fit among transgender and nonbinary adults. Key PointsWe assessed the Eating Disorder Examination‐Questionnaire in transgender men, transgender women, and gender‐expansive people.Confirmatory factor analysis of a seven‐item model had the best fit among gender minority people.The three factors included dietary restraint, shape and weight overvaluation, and body dissatisfaction.Internal consistencies of the three subscales and measurement invariance were adequate in all groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]