Back to Search Start Over

Balsam fir and white spruce seedling recruitment in response to understory release, seedbed type, and litter exclusion in trembling aspen stands.

Authors :
Wang, G. Geoff
Kemball, Kevin J.
Source :
Canadian Journal of Forest Research. Mar2005, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p667-673. 7p. 2 Charts, 5 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

Experimental seeding of balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) was implemented in three mature trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) stands in southeastern Manitoba to test (i) the effect of vegetation (light) competition and seedbed type (undisturbed forest floor, exposed mineral soil, and rotten logs) on seedling recruitment over the first 2 years and (ii) the effect of broadleaf litter exclusion on seedling mortality during the first winter. The study indicated that, with adequate seed supply, seedbed type was the most important factor limiting seedling recruitment, especially the recruitment of white spruce, in trembling aspen stands. Seedling recruitment on the best and the worst seedbeds differed by 1.8 times for balsam fir but by 19 times for white spruce. Significant differences in soil moisture and temperature were found between seedbed types. Broadleaf litter exclusion also facilitated the recruitment of balsam fir and white spruce, but only on undisturbed forest floor. Vegetation (light) competition, however, did not limit seedling recruitment. On the contrary, the presence of understory vegetation benefited seedling recruitment on rotten logs. Compared with white spruce, balsam fir is better adapted to regenerate in trembling aspen stands. Balsam fir was about 4, 12, and 36 times better than white spruce when regenerating on exposed mineral soil, rotten log, and undisturbed forest floor, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00455067
Volume :
35
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16760111
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1139/X04-212