Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness of scapular mobilization in people with subacromial impingement syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors :
Gutiérrez-Espinoza, Héctor
Pinto-Concha, Sebastián
Sepúlveda-Osses, Oscar
Araya-Quintanilla, Felipe
Source :
Annals of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine. Jun2023, Vol. 66 Issue 5, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

• Biomechanical rationale for improving function with joint mobilization is unclear. • Adding scapular mobilization to exercises did not further improve function. • Only the exercise program improved upper limb function. Scapular mobilization is a manual therapy technique widely used in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder. To determine the effects of scapular mobilization in addition to an exercise program in people with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Seventy-two adults with SIS were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups. The control group (n=36) participated in a 6-week exercise program, and the intervention group (n = 36) participated in the same exercise program plus passive manual scapular mobilization. Both groups were assessed at baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment). The primary outcome measure was upper limb function assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcome measures were the Constant-Murley questionnaire, pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), and scapular upward rotation. All participants completed the trial. The between-group difference in DASH was -1.1 points (Cohen d = 0.05; p = 0.911), Constant-Murley 2.1 points (Cohen d = 0.08; p = 0.841), VAS rating of pain at rest -0.1 cm (Cohen d = 0.05; p = 0.684), and VAS rating of pain during movement -0.2 cm (Cohen d = 0.09; p = 0.764); scapular upward rotation at rest (arm by the side) was 0.6° (Cohen d = 0.09; p = 0.237), at 45° shoulder abduction was 0.8° (Cohen d = 0.13; p = 0.096), at 90° was 0.1° (Cohen d = 0.04; p = 0.783), and at 135° was 0.1° (Cohen d = 0.07; p = 0.886). Most differences were in favor of the intervention group; however, the effect sizes were weak and not statistically significant. In the short-term, the addition of scapular mobilization did not provide significant clinical benefits in terms of function, pain or scapular motion in participants with SIS. Brazilian registry of clinical trials UTN number U1111-1226-2081. Registered February 25, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18770657
Volume :
66
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Annals of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164865587
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101744