Back to Search Start Over

Use of Modulated Excitation Signals in Medical Ultrasound. Part I: Basic Concepts and Expected Benefits.

Authors :
Misaridis, Thanassis
Jensen, Jørgen Arendt
Source :
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control. Feb2005, Vol. 52 Issue 2, p177-191. 15p. 2 Black and White Photographs.
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

This paper, the first from a series of three papers on the application of coded excitation signals in medical ultrasound, discusses the basic principles and ultrasound-related problems of pulse compression. The concepts of signal modulation and matched filtering are given, and a simple model of attenuation relates the matched filter response with the ambiguity function, known from radar. Based on this analysis and the properties of the ambiguity function, the selection of coded waveforms suitable for ultrasound imaging is discussed. It is shown that linear frequency modulation (FM) signals have the best and most robust features for ultrasound imaging. Other coded signals such as nonlinear FM and binary complementary Golay codes also have been considered and characterized in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and sensitivity to frequency shifts. Using the simulation program Field II, it is found that in the case of linear FM signals, a SNR improvement of 12 to 18 dB can be expected for large imaging depths in attenuating media, without any depth-dependent filter compensation. In contrast, nonlinear FM modulation and binary codes are shown to give a SNR improvement of only 4 to 9 dB when processed with a matched filter. Other issues, such as depth-dependent matched filtering and use of filters other than the matched filter (inverse and Wiener filters) also are addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08853010
Volume :
52
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics & Frequency Control
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
16483583
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2005.1406545