Bile duct adenoma and small‐sized small duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma show distinct differences in genetic alterations, expression of IMP3 and EZH2 and stromal and inflammatory components.

Aims: Given that bile duct adenoma was significantly more prevalent in the liver with small duct type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (small duct iCCA), compared to other primary liver carcinomas, we examined the possibility of bile duct adenoma as a precursor of small duct iCCA by analysing genetic alterations and other features in bile duct adenomas. Methods and results: Subjects included 33 bile duct adenomas and 17 small‐sized (up to 2 cm in diameter) small duct iCCAs. Genetic alterations were examined by direct sequencing for hot‐spot regions and immunohistochemical staining. The expression of p16INK4a, EZH2 and IMP3 and stromal and inflammatory components were also examined. Genetic alterations examined including BRAF were not detected in bile duct adenomas, whereas genetic alterations of p53 (47%), ARID1A (41%), PBRM1 (12%), MTAP (12%), IDH1 (6%), KRAS (6%) and TERT promoter (6%) were detected in 16 small‐sized small duct iCCA (94%) (P < 0.01). The expression of IMP3 and EZH2 was not detected in bile duct adenomas, whereas it was detected in most small duct iCCA (94%) (P < 0.01). Immature stroma and neutrophilic infiltration were significantly more prevalent in small duct iCCA, compared to bile duct adenoma (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Bile duct adenomas and small‐sized small duct iCCAs show distinct differences in genetic alterations, expression of IMP3 and EZH2 and stromal and inflammatory components. There was no evidence suggesting that bile duct adenoma is a precursor of small duct iCCA. Immunohistochemical staining for IMP3, EZH2, p53, ARID1A and MTAP may be useful for differential diagnosis between bile duct adenomas and small duct iCCAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]