Back to Search Start Over

Diagnostic effectiveness of [18F]Fluoroestradiol PET/CT in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: the key role of histopathology. Evidence from an international multicentre prospective study.

Authors :
Bottoni, Gianluca
Fiz, Francesco
Puntoni, Matteo
Matteucci, Federica
Monti, Manuela
DeCensi, Andrea
Nanni, Oriana
Brain, Etienne
Alberini, Jean Louis
Dib, Bassam
Sacchetti, Gianmauro
Trimboli, Pierpaolo
Treglia, Giorgio
Harbeck, Nadia
Sola, Simona
Gennari, Alessandra
Piccardo, Arnoldo
Source :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging. Jul2023, Vol. 50 Issue 8, p2477-2485. 9p. 1 Black and White Photograph, 4 Charts.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Introduction: [18F]Fluoroestradiol ([18F]FES) PET/CT has been proposed as a tool for detecting the oestrogen receptor density in patients with metastatic breast cancer (BC) non-invasively across all disease localizations. However, its diagnostic potential in terms of the detection rate (DR) of metastases is unclear. In this study, we pitted this method against [18F]FDG PET/CT and tried to identify predictors of the diagnostic superiority of the [18F] FES-based method. Materials and methods: From a multicentre database, we enrolled all patients with metastatic BC who had undergone both [18F]FES PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT. Two readers assessed both images independently and used a patient-based (PBA) and lesion-based analysis (LBA) to calculate the DR. Pathology-related and clinical factors were tested as predictors of [18F]FES PET/CT superiority using a multivariate model. Results: 92 patients, bearing a total of 2678 metastases, were enrolled. On PBA, the DR of [18F]FDG and [18F]FES PET/CT was 97% and 86%, respectively (p = 0.018). On LBA, the [18F]FES method proved more sensitive than [18F]FDG PET/CT in lymph nodes, bone, lung and soft tissue (p < 0.01). This greater sensitivity was associated with lobular histology, both on PBA (Odds Ratio (OR) 3.4, 95%CI 1.0–12.3) and on LBA (OR 4.4, 95%CI 1.2–16.1 for lymph node metastases and OR 3.29, 95%CI 1.1–10.2 for bone localizations). Conclusions: The overall DR of [18F]FES PET/CT appears to be lower than that of [18F]FDG PET/CT on PBA. However, the [18F]FES method, if positive, can identify more lesions than [18F]FDG at most sites. The higher sensitivity of [18F]FES PET/CT was associated with lobular histology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16197070
Volume :
50
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
164176955
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06173-9