An experimental study of various load control strategies for an ammonia/hydrogen dual-fuel engine with the Miller cycle.

Hydrogen and ammonia, as two renewable carbon-free combustibles, are considered to be potentially excellent alternative fuels for internal combustion engines. Since hydrogen and ammonia have opposite and complementary combustion characteristics, the co-combustion of ammonia with hydrogen is reasonable. However, there are few detailed experimental studies of load control strategies for an ammonia‑hydrogen engine. In this study, four load control strategies including the variation of ammonia volume share (AVS), qualitative control, quantitative control, and adjustment of intake variable valve timing (VVT) are proposed and assessed for their applicability in an ammonia/hydrogen dual-fuel engine. The ignition and combustion characteristics of ammonia do not allow for high thermal efficiency, so the Miller cycle is introduced to improve engine performance. The engine employs fuel supply modes of ammonia port injection and hydrogen direct injection at 1500 rpm. In general, the engine achieves higher brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) and brake thermal efficiency (BTE) at different AVS. Moreover, qualitative control and adjustment of intake VVT allow the engine to own a wide regulation range of BMEP and maintain the BTE of more than 37% under most conditions. However, quantitative control appears to be an inadequate strategy for the engine due to the lower BMEP and BTE. • The co-combustion of ammonia with hydrogen and hydrogen direct injection are crucial. • Four load control strategies are proposed for an ammonia/hydrogen dual-fuel engine. • Technologies of the Miller cycle and variable valve timing are used in the engine. • Higher cyclic variation should be avoided when using various load control strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]