Back to Search Start Over

Optimizing graft‐recipient size matching in adolescent liver transplantation: Don't forget ex situ right posterior sectionectomy.

Authors :
Rossignol, Guillaume
Muller, Xavier
Dubois, Remi
Rode, Agnes
Mabrut, Jean‐Yves
Mohkam, Kayvan
Source :
Pediatric Transplantation. Jun2023, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1-7. 7p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Graft‐recipient size matching is a major challenge in pediatric liver transplantation, especially for adolescent recipients. Indeed, adolescents have the lowest transplantation rate among pediatric recipients, despite prioritization policies and the use of split grafts. In case of an important graft‐recipient size mismatch, ex situ graft reduction with right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) may optimize the available donor pool to benefit adolescent recipients. Methods: We present three cases of liver graft reduction with ex situ RPS for adolescent recipients. The surgical strategy was guided by GRWR (graft/recipient weight ratio), GW/RAP (right anteroposterior distance ratio), and CT‐scan volumetric and anthropometric evaluation. Results: Recipients were 12, 13, and 14‐year‐old and weighed 32, 47, and 35 kg, respectively. All liver grafts were procured from brain‐dead donors with a donor/recipient weight ratio >1.5. RPS was performed ex situ, removing 20% of the total liver volume leading to a decrease of the GRWR <4% and the GW/RAP <100 g/cm in each case. All three reduced grafts were successfully transplanted with a static cold storage time ranging from 390 to 510 min without the need for delayed abdominal closure. We did not observe any primary non‐function, vascular complication, or delayed graft function with a median follow‐up of 6 months. One biliary anastomotic stenosis occurred which required surgical treatment. Conclusion: Ex situ liver graft reduction with RPS allowed for successful transplantation in case of anthropometric graft‐recipient size mismatch in adolescent liver transplant candidates. Although the use of split grafts remains the gold standard, RPS should be acknowledged as a way to optimize the donor pool, especially for adolescent recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13973142
Volume :
27
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Pediatric Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163743407
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14510