Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Surgery versus Open Surgery in Elderly Patients with Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

Introduction: The safety of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and its effect on survival have not been sufficiently assessed in elderly colon cancer patients. Methods: Clinicopathologic data of patients aged ≥75 years who underwent colectomy for primary colon cancer, between January 2018 and June 2021, were reviewed. Patients were divided into the LS and open surgery (OS) groups according to the intention-to-treat principle and were compared using propensity score matching. The primary outcomes were differences in surgical safety and 3-year survival. Results: There were 98 patients with a median age of 82 years and 85 patients with a median age of 80 years assigned to the OS and LS groups, respectively. Propensity score matching revealed that LS did not prolong the operative time (190 vs. 180 min, p = 0.209) and was linked to less intraoperative blood loss (50 vs. 100 mL, p = 0.039) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (8 vs. 10 days, p = 0.005), compared to OS. In addition, LS was not accompanied by more stress response when the variations exhibited in laboratory tests and the Barthel index pre- and postsurgery were considered. There were no significant differences in the adjusted 3-year overall survival (86.0% vs. 81.2%, p = 0.795) and disease-free survival (86.6% vs. 87.9%, p = 0.356) between the groups. Conclusion: LS enhanced postoperative recovery without increasing surgical risks, compared to OS, in colon cancer patients aged ≥75 years. Furthermore, no significant differences in the 3-year adjusted survival were observed between the groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]