Recurrent, life-threatening PE in the setting of popliteal vein aneurysm in pregnancy: a case report.

Background: Popliteal vein aneurysms (PVA) are a rare clinical entity with unknown etiology that pose a significant risk for venous thromboembolic events (VTE). The current literature supports anticoagulation and operative management. There are few case reports of PVA in pregnancy. We present a unique case of a pregnant patient with recurrent pulmonary embolism (PE) in the setting of PVA with intra-aneurysmal thrombosis who ultimately underwent surgical excision. Case presentation: A previously healthy 34-year-old G2P1 at 30 weeks gestation presented to the emergency department with shortness of breath and chest pain. She was diagnosed with PE and subsequently required intensive care unit (ICU) admission and thrombolysis for a massive PE. While on a therapeutic dose of tinzaparin she had recurrence of PE in the post-partum period. She was treated with supratherapeutic tinzaparin and subsequently transitioned to warfarin. She was found to have a PVA and ultimately underwent successful PVA ligation. She remains on anticoagulation for secondary prevention of VTE. Conclusions: PVA are a rare but potentially fatal source of VTE. Patients most commonly present with symptoms of PE. The risk of VTE is elevated in the pro-thrombotic states of pregnancy and the post-partum period due to both physiologic and anatomical changes. The recommended management of PVA with PE is anticoagulation and surgical resection of the aneurysm, however this can be complicated in the setting of pregnancy. We demonstrated that pregnant patients with PVA can be temporized with medical management to avoid surgical intervention during pregnancy, but require close symptom monitoring and serial imaging to reassess the PVA, with high index of suspicion for recurrent VTE. Ultimately, patients with PVA and PE should undergo surgical resection to reduce the risk of recurrence and long-term complications. The ideal duration of post-operative anticoagulation remains unclear, and should likely be decided on based on risks, benefits, values, and shared decision making with the patient and their care provider. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]