Back to Search
Start Over
Examining respect, autonomy, and mistreatment in childbirth in the US: do provider type and place of birth matter?
- Source :
-
Reproductive Health . 5/1/2023, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-12. 12p. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Background: Analyses of factors that determine quality of perinatal care consistently rely on clinical markers, while failing to assess experiential outcomes. Understanding how model of care and birth setting influence experiences of respect, autonomy, and decision making, is essential for comprehensive assessment of quality. Methods: We examined responses (n = 1771) to an online cross-sectional national survey capturing experiences of perinatal care in the United States. We used validated patient-oriented measures and scales to assess four domains of experience: (1) decision-making, (2) respect, (3) mistreatment, and (4) time spent during visits. We categorized the provider type and birth setting into three groups: midwife at community birth, midwife at hospital-birth, and physician at hospital-birth. For each group, we used multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, to estimate the odds of experiential outcomes in all the four domains. Results: Compared to those cared for by physicians in hospitals, individuals cared for by midwives in community settings had more than five times the odds of experiencing higher autonomy (aOR: 5.22, 95% CI: 3.65–7.45), higher respect (aOR: 5.39, 95% CI: 3.72–7.82) and lower odds of mistreatment (aOR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10–0.26). We found significant differences across birth settings: participants cared for by midwives in the community settings had significantly better experiential outcomes than those in the hospital settings: high- autonomy (aOR: 2.97, 95% CI: 2.66–4.27), respect (aOR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.81–6.14), mistreatment (aOR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.11–0.34), time spent (aOR: 8.06, 95% CI: 4.26–15.28). Conclusion: Participants reported better experiential outcomes when cared for by midwives than by physicians. And for those receiving midwifery care, the quality of experiential outcomes was significantly higher in community settings than in hospital settings. Care settings matter and structures of hospital-based care may impair implementation of the person-centered midwifery care model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *CHILDBIRTH & psychology
*PATIENT abuse
*BIRTHPLACES
*MEDICAL quality control
*HOSPITALS
*PATIENT autonomy
*ATTITUDES of mothers
*CONFIDENCE intervals
*OFFENSIVE behavior
*CROSS-sectional method
*PATIENT decision making
*TIME
*MULTIVARIATE analysis
*MIDWIFERY
*BIRTHING centers
*PATIENTS' attitudes
*CHILDBIRTH at home
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*RESEARCH funding
*RESPECT
*PATIENT-professional relations
*MEDICAL appointments
*PHYSICIANS
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*ODDS ratio
*DELIVERY (Obstetrics)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17424755
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Reproductive Health
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 163414073
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01584-1