Back to Search Start Over

Residual motion of different posterior instrumentation and interbody fusion constructs.

Authors :
Burkhard, Marco D.
Spirig, José M.
Wanivenhaus, Florian
Cornaz, Frédéric
Fasser, Marie-Rosa
Widmer, Jonas
Farshad, Mazda
Source :
European Spine Journal. Apr2023, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p1411-1420. 10p. 2 Color Photographs, 2 Charts, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Purpose: To elucidate residual motion of cortical screw (CS) and pedicle screw (PS) constructs with unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion (ul-PLIF), bilateral PLIF (bl-PLIF), facet-sparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (fs-TLIF), and facet-resecting TLIF (fr-TLIF). Methods: A total of 35 human cadaver lumbar segments were instrumented with PS (n = 18) and CS (n = 17). Range of motion (ROM) and relative ROM changes were recorded in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), and axial compression (AC) in five instrumentational states: without interbody fusion (wo-IF), ul-PLIF, bl-PLIF, fs-TLIF, and fr-TLIF. Results: Whereas FE, LB, AR, and AC noticeably differed between the instrumentational states, AS and LS were less prominently affected. Compared to wo-IF, ul-PLIF caused a significant increase in ROM with PS (FE + 42%, LB + 24%, AR + 34%, and AC + 77%), however, such changes were non-significant with CS. ROM was similar between wo-IF and all other interbody fusion techniques. Insertion of a second PLIF (bl-PLIF) significantly decreased ROM with CS (FE -17%, LB -26%, AR -20%, AC -51%) and PS (FE − 23%, LB − 14%, AR − 20%, AC − 45%,). Facet removal in TLIF significantly increased ROM with CS (FE + 6%, LB + 9%, AR + 17%, AC of + 23%) and PS (FE + 7%, AR + 12%, AC + 13%). Conclusion: bl-PLIF and TLIF show similarly low residual motion in both PS and CS constructs, but ul-PLIF results in increased motion. The fs-TLIF technique is able to further decrease motion compared to fr-TLIF in both the CS and PS constructs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09406719
Volume :
32
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Spine Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162970854
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07597-5