Writer-independent signature verification; Evaluation of robotic and generative adversarial attacks.

Forgery of a signature with the aim of deception is a serious crime. Machine learning is often employed to detect real and forged signatures. In this study, we present results which argue that robotic arms and generative models can overcome these systems and mount false-acceptance attacks. Convolutional neural networks and data augmentation strategies are tuned, producing a model of 87.12% accuracy for the verification of 2,640 human signatures. Two approaches are used to successfully attack the model with false-acceptance of forgeries. Robotic arms (Line-us and iDraw) physically copy real signatures on paper, and a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) is trained to generate signatures based on the binary class of 'genuine' and 'forged'. The 87.12% error margin is overcome by all approaches; prevalence of successful attacks is 32% for iDraw 2.0, 24% for Line-us, and 40% for the GAN. Fine-tuning with examples show that false-acceptance is preventable. We find attack success reduced by 24% for iDraw, 12% for Line-us, and 36% for the GAN. Results show exclusive behaviours between human and robotic forgers, suggesting training wholly on human forgeries can be attacked by robots, thus we argue in favour of fine-tuning systems with robotic forgeries to reduce their prevalence. • Development of a computer vision-based system for signature spoofing attack detection. • A Conditional GAN can generate "real" and "fake" signatures. • Two robots can physically replicate human signatures with pen and paper. • The GAN and both robots can fool the model and mount false-acceptance attacks. • Verification model can be defended by fine-tuning on generative and robotic forgeries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]