Back to Search Start Over

Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis of Pancreatic Cancer Using Residual Liquid Cytology Specimens from Endoscopic Ultrasound—Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy: A Prospective Comparative Study with Tissue Specimens.

Authors :
Iwaya, Hiromichi
Tanimoto, Akihide
Toyodome, Koshiro
Kojima, Issei
Hinokuchi, Makoto
Tanoue, Shiroh
Hashimoto, Shinichi
Kawahira, Machiko
Arima, Shiho
Kanmura, Shuji
Akahane, Toshiaki
Higashi, Michiyo
Suzuki, Shinsuke
Ueno, Shinichi
Ohtsuka, Takao
Ido, Akio
Source :
Diagnostics (2075-4418). Mar2023, Vol. 13 Issue 6, p1078. 13p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

This study evaluated the feasibility and clinical utility of liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens via endoscopic ultrasound–guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for next-generation sequencing (NGS) of pancreatic cancer (PC). We prospectively evaluated the performance of DNA extraction and NGS using EUS-FNB samples obtained from PC. Thirty-three consecutive patients with PC who underwent EUS-FNB at our hospital were enrolled. DNA samples were obtained from 96.8% of the patients. When stratified with a variant allele frequency (VAF) > 10% tumor burden, the NGS success rate was 76.7% (n = 23) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE), 83.3% (n = 25) in LBC, and 76.7% (n = 23) in frozen samples. The overall NGS success rate was 86.7% (n = 26) using FFPE, LBC, or frozen samples. The detection rates for the main mutated genes were as follows: 86.7% for KRAS, 73.3% for TP53, 66.7% for CDKN2A, 36.7% for SMAD4, and 16.7% for ARID1A. LBC had the highest median value of VAF (23.5%) for KRAS and TP53. PC mutation analysis using NGS was successfully performed using LBC compared with FFPE and frozen samples. This approach provides an alternative and affordable source of molecular testing materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20754418
Volume :
13
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Diagnostics (2075-4418)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
162748663
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061078