Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of previous lumbar spine surgery on the outcome of lumbar total disc replacement: analysis of prospective 5-year follow-up study data.
- Source :
-
European Spine Journal . Mar2023, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p797-802. 6p. 1 Diagram, 1 Chart, 5 Graphs. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Purpose: It is sometimes anticipated that patients with prior spine surgery will have a compromised outcome from future procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare TDR outcomes in patients with prior lumbar spine surgery to those with no previous surgery. Methods: Post hoc analysis was performed on 5-year follow-up data collected prospectively in the multi-centre FDA-regulated trial for the activL® Artificial Disc which involved 376 patients treated for single-level symptomatic disc degeneration. Clinical outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scales (VAS) assessing back and leg pain, SF-36, adverse events, and re-operations. Radiographic outcomes included flexion/extension range of motion (ROM) and translation of the operated segment. Patients were divided into two groups: Prior Lumbar Surgery (PLS, n = 92) and No Prior Lumbar Surgery (NPLS, n = 284). Results: Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. ODI, VAS, and SF-36 Physical Component Scale scores improved significantly (p < 0.05) from baseline in both groups with improvements maintained through 5-year post-TDR with no significant differences between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of serious device-related events, procedure-related events, or re-operations. While ROM was significantly less prior to TDR surgery in the PLS group, there was no significant difference in ROM at post-operative points. Conclusion: Prior lumbar spine surgery was not associated with compromised outcomes following TDR. These results are in line with reports from earlier studies with shorter follow-up, finding that non-destabilizing prior surgery is not a contra-indication for TDR provided that selection criteria are met. Level of Evidence I: Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with the consistently applied reference standard and blinding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09406719
- Volume :
- 32
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- European Spine Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 162259285
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07492-5