Back to Search
Start Over
Cognitive bias and the order of examination in forensic anthropological non-metric methods: a pilot study.
- Source :
-
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences . Apr2023, Vol. 55 Issue 2, p255-271. 17p. - Publication Year :
- 2023
-
Abstract
- Research has established that contextual information has the potential to influence the decisions of examiners in various forensic domains, including forensic anthropology. Studies have demonstrated that the non-metric sex estimation methods are susceptible to issues of cognitive bias, however the different types of stimuli that can influence the decision-making process remain understudied. As forensic anthropologists will examine multiple skeletal elements to estimate the sex of skeletal remains, a pilot study was designed to assess the potential of cognitive bias resulting from the order of examination. Two groups performed a non-metric sex estimation of the innominates and the skull with methods from Standards on one individual complete skeleton. Group A examined the skull first followed by the innominates, while Group B examined the innominates first followed by the skull. Results reveal a significant difference between the two groups in the sex estimation of the innominates and the complete skeleton (p = 0.020 and p = 0.022, respectively). This research demonstrates that order of examination for sex estimation may act as context and potentially influence the subsequent analyses. Additional research is necessary to broaden the understanding of decision-making and aid in the establishment of standard operating procedures designed to mitigate the potential effects of cognitive bias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00450618
- Volume :
- 55
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 162238474
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2021.1998625