THE ARTSAKH ISSUE IN ITS HISTORICAL-LEGAL DEVELOPMENT.

Artsakh or Karabagh is an integral part of historic Armenia. Felling under the rule of various conquerors throughout history, Artsakh remained Armenian, sometimes possessing also a semiindependent status. The legal history of the Artsakh dispute can be traced back to the 1813 Treaty of Gulistan, when Persia ceded sovereignty of Artsakh to the Russian Empire. After the collapse of the Russian Empire, during 1918-1920 Artsakh was disputed by the Republics of Armenia and Azerbaijan, because of the administrative policy of the former Russian Empire to unite the national territories into mixed administrative unites. After being incorporated into the Soviet Union, again because of the same administrative police, the Armenian populated Artsakh was incorporated into Soviet Azerbaijan as an autonomous district (marz). Utilizing Article 3 of the “Law on Procedure for Resolving Questions Connected with a Union Republic’s Secession from the USSR,” which provides right to the people of autonomous republics and autonomous formations to independently decide their future state-legal status, on 2 September, 1991, a joint session of the People’s Deputies of the Nagorno-Karabagh Autonomous Region and Shahumyan regional councils, declared the establishment of the Nagorno-Karabagh Republic (NKR). This move was followed by a referendum, where 99,9% voted for independence of NKR. After this vote until now, Azerbaijan tries to seize Artsakh by force, which is contrary to international law. This article aims to study the status of Artsakh in the context of the above historical-legal developments. It clearly demonstrates that the right of people of Artsakh to independence is undisputable. The article will also present the false dilemma of the concepts of territorial integrity and self-determination and will argue for the use of remedial secession in the case of Artsakh. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]